Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

August 05, 2021 | Athletics | Arbitration



  • Sport: Athletics
  • Issue: Arbitration
  • Type: Anti-Doping
  • Tribunal: Jeremy Summers, Katherine Apps, Carole Billington-Wood
  • Decision date: 02 August 2021
  • Outcome: 28 months Ineligibility.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

Related Documents

Should you require Sport Resolutions to conduct and manage an investigation, review or inquiry, please contact us.

Scroll To Top