decisions
Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)
Decision Summary
- Sport: Athletics
- Issue: Arbitration
- Type: Anti-Doping
- Tribunal: Jeremy Summers, Katherine Apps, Carole Billington-Wood
- Decision date: 02 August 2021
- Outcome: 28 months Ineligibility.
A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).
Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.
The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022.
A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.
The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.
Related Documents
- Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
Need help or assistance?
Should you require Sport Resolutions to conduct and manage an investigation, review or inquiry, or have any other enquiries, please get in touch.