ASADA responds to Essendon doping scandal which saw 34 players banned

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

Australian Football League (AFL) team the Essendon Bombers saw 34 of its first team squad banned for a period of 12 months in 2016 after the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) found the team had committed doping violations.  

The club was running a supplements injection programme between November 2011 and September 2012, at which time the programme ended with the dismissal of biochemist Stephen Dank who had been running the programme and previously told to stop by the club management. The AFL and the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) then began an investigation into the programme in February 2013, during the investigation there were several financial and competition related penalties imposed on the club and its senior management such as the head coach but from the tribunal hearing of the 34 players in early 2015 the AFL announced that all 34 were found to be not guilty of using the banned substance Thymosin beta-4.

ASADA then announced that they would not appeal this decision but in May 2015 the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) filed an appeal of the tribunal hearing with the appeal being heard by CAS in Sydney. CAS held that the 34 players had violated the doping code and were therefore banned for two years which was backdated to 2015 so that they faced a remaining 12 month ban up to 2017 and their subsequent appeal was unsuccessful.

However, new information has come to light which states that whilst the banned substance Thymosin 4-beta was on WADA’s prohibited list, it could not be found on ASADA’s list as they had failed to include its prohibition. This means that if the team were only checking ASADA’s prohibited list then they would have been unaware of the substance being banned as it was not listed, in fact it is reported that the substance was only placed on their list in February 2013 which is roughly five months after the Essendon players supplement injection programme had ended.

Some are now questioning the validity of the case and the resulting fines and bans that were imposed but ASADA has said in a statement that it strongly denies the allegations of evidence manipulation as the substance had been on the WADA prohibited list since 2010 so was always banned even though it wasn’t specifically listed by ASADA. They claim that “it is impossible to list every substance” on their Check Your Substance database and that teams should still be checking the full complete WADA list. ASADA continued with “The World Anti-Doping Agency has sole responsibility for setting and determining prohibited substances. It is not possible to manipulate whether or not substances are prohibited.”

The club, players and Essendon staff members may potentially seek to bring legal claims if they feel that this new information provides them with a legal challenge against their bans and other punishments.

You can read the ASADA statement here.

You may also like

View All

Pinned Article

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2026: Early Bird Tickets Now on Sale

Early Bird tickets for the Sport Resolutions 11th Annual Conference are now available. Join leading sport and legal professionals in London on 7 May 2026 for a full day of discussion, insight, and networking

Read More

The global sports industry could possibly lose $1.6 trillion by 2050 due to physical inactivity and climate change

A combination of climate change and a lack of physical activity could mean that the global sports industry risks losing $1.6 trillion (£1.2 trillion) by 2050, according to the World Economic Forum’s recent report titled ‘Sports for People and Planet’

Read More

Two separate surveys reveal serious sexual safety risks for women in UK sport and high bullying rates among female coaches

Two recent surveys highlight ongoing risks for women in UK sport. In elite sport, 88% of respondents reported experiencing sexual misconduct, with women with disabilities disproportionately affected. Among coaches, women face higher rates of bullying, harassment, and aggression than men, particularly in high-performance settings

Read More