Gerard Elias QC appointed Sports Resolutions Chairman

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

Gerard Elias has had substantial experience in sport and sports law. He has been ECB's Chairman of Discipline for the past 10 years and is a former Chairman of Glamorgan County Cricket Club. He has chaired Disciplinary Tribunals for many sports including the Welsh Rugby Union and other professional bodies. He has also been a member of SDRP's Panel of Arbitrators (Chairpersons' List). He took silk in 1984 and, among other appointments, sits as a Recorder of the Crown Court and as a Deputy High Court Judge.

Gerard Elias succeeds SDRP's founder Chairman, Charles Woodhouse CVO, who retires after ten years.

I am absolutely delighted that someone of Gerard Elias's ability, standing and knowledge of sport and sports law has accepted the challenge of leading SDRP, said retiring Chairman Charles Woodhouse. He will bring to SDRP new strong leadership and a high profile as sport in the UK looks forward to 2012 when the services of an independent body like SDRP could make a real difference.

Gerard Elias will serve as Chairman working part time for SDRP whilst continuing in practice as a barrister at Farrar's Building. He will lead the Board of SDRP, an independent organisation established by the major sports representative bodies in the UK, to provide a mechanism for resolving sports disputes simply, fairly and cost effectively.

Gerard Elias will work closely with SDRP's new Executive Director, Ed Procter, who was appointed in September 2006. Elias will lead the development of SDRP's vision of Just Sport, play a major role in its communication and ensure that key stakeholders in sport in the UK, who are all SDRP members, support SDRP's strategy and direction.

Speaking about his appointment, Gerard Elias said:

The challenge to lead and promote an independent and responsive dispute and mediation body in sport is an exciting one

the dispute in rugby union over participation in next season's Heineken Cup is yet one more example of sport needing such a body

Elias continued,

I strongly believe that sport sets standards that the young imitate and that the value of setting up fair and just, but expeditious, procedures to resolve disputes cannot be underestimated. The globalisation of sport and the intense media coverage of any disputes which arise, against a background of threats of recourse to litigation, make ever more relevant and important an independent, respected and effective dispute resolution service.

You may also like

View All

Dallas judge prohibits NCAA and SEC from banning 41 athletes from returning to college sport for one more season

A Dallas judge has prohibited the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Southeastern Conference from banning a number of athletes, 3 of which are part of NFL rosters, from returning to college sport for one more season 

Read More

Abuse victims receive over $3 million from Australian Institute of Sport

The Australian Institute of Sport has collectively paid over $3 million to over 225 athletes who experienced abuse at Australia’s elite sports training centre

Read More

Sport Resolutions’ 2025/26 Annual Report is ready to view

Sport Resolutions’ 2025/26 Annual Report is now live, providing a transparent, comprehensive summary of Sport Resolutions’ activity and profile across the last financial year (1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026), including some of our most notable concluded national and international cases and their outcomes

Read More