IAAF v Abraham Kiptum

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Abraham Kiptum has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 3rd April 2019 Mr Kiptum was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in the haematological module of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Michael J Beloff QC, Paul Ciucur and Dennis Koolaard, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Kiptum. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

Ice hockey neck guards compulsory at 2026 Winter Olympic Games

For the first time, ice hockey neck guards will be made compulsory at the Winter Olympics by the International Ice Hockey Federation following the tragic death of player Adam Johnson

Read More

Sky Sports drops women’s sport TikTok account after only three days after its posts were described by followers as “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Sky Sports has dropped its women’s sport TikTok account Halo just days after its creation following criticism that its posts were “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Read More

WADA shares final drafts of the 2027 World Anti-Doping Code and International Standards and related documents

The World Anti-Doping Agency has shared its proposed final drafts of the 2027 World Anti-Doping Code and International Standards

Read More