IAAF v Abraham Kiptum

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Abraham Kiptum has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 3rd April 2019 Mr Kiptum was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in the haematological module of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Michael J Beloff QC, Paul Ciucur and Dennis Koolaard, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Kiptum. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

Sport England impels Ofcom to address abuse of female footballers

The chair of Sport England Chris Boardman has urged Ofcom to address the recent online abuse targeted at the England Women’s football team

Read More

World Athletics v Madhuri Kale

A decision has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal in the case of World Athletics against Ms Madhuri Kale

Read More

Judge stays former Penn swimmers’ Title IX lawsuit

On Tuesday, federal judge William Young halted court proceedings on a lawsuit brought by three former University of Pennsylvania swimmers after the university allowed a transgender athlete to compete in the 2022 Women’s Ivy League Swimming and Diving Championships

Read More