IAAF v Abraham Kiptum

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Abraham Kiptum has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 3rd April 2019 Mr Kiptum was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in the haematological module of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Michael J Beloff QC, Paul Ciucur and Dennis Koolaard, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Kiptum. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

Boxer Jai Opetaia sues IBF for removing his cruiserweight world title

Australian boxer Jai Opetaia is suing the International Boxing Federation for removing his cruiserweight world title after his first fight with Zuffa Boxing, a professional boxing promotion

Read More

Sport Resolutions to administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court at Glasgow 2026

Sport Resolutions will administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court and Independent Tribunal at Glasgow 2026, providing independent dispute resolution support throughout the Games. Drawing on its Birmingham 2022 experience, Sport Resolutions will provide expert panels to resolve disciplinary, anti-doping, eligibility, safeguarding, and selection matters fairly and efficiently

Read More

UK Anti-Doping v Daphne Schrager

A decision in the case of UK Anti-Doping against Daphne Schrager has been issued by the National Anti-Doping Panel

Read More