IAAF v Abraham Kiptum

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Abraham Kiptum has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 3rd April 2019 Mr Kiptum was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in the haematological module of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Michael J Beloff QC, Paul Ciucur and Dennis Koolaard, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Kiptum. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

WRU plans to cut the number of professional clubs from four to two

The Welsh Rugby Union plans to cut the number of its professional clubs from four to two, insisting that this is vital to protect the game

Read More

World Cup final to be the most attended women’s rugby match in history

Women’s Rugby World Cup organisers have announced that the tournament’s final will be the most attended women’s rugby match in history with 82,000 attendees expected in Twickenham

Read More

ITIA v Teso

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) against Kaili Demi Teso has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More