IAAF v Cyrus Rutto


IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP is now Sold Out

We’re excited to share that the Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 has reached full capacity!

Read More

The Governance of Football – is it broken and does it need fixing?

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP

Read More

The Supreme Court ruling and its impact on sport

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: