IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

All five athletes found not guilty in Hockey Canada sexual assault case

Judge Justice Maria Carroccia has independently ruled that all five male ice hockey players are not guilty of sexual assault in Hockey Canada’s notorious case

Read More

Transgender cyclist wins discrimination case against UCI

A transgender cyclist has won a discrimination case against the Union Cycliste Internationale

Read More

New chair appointed to lead UK Anti-Doping

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has announced the appointment of a new Chair for UK Anti-Doping (UKAD), who brings extensive legal, regulatory, and sporting experience to the role

Read More