IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

The Football Association v Lucas Paquetá

A decision in the case of The Football Association against Lucas Paquetá has been issued by the Independent Regulatory Commission

Read More

Minimum salaries introduced in WSL and WSL2, along with other vital wellbeing support

After an extensive consultation with the Professional Footballers’ Association, Women’s Super League and Women’s Super League 2 footballers will be given a minimum salary level. A mandatory performance wellbeing role within all clubs will also be introduced

Read More

UN shares updated anti-corruption plan for 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has shared its new anti-corruption plan for the 2026 FIFA World Cup and Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games which will protect both events from match-fixing within the U.S. The plan has been influenced by G20’s High-Level Principles

Read More