IAAF v Cyrus Rutto


IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

World Aquatics becomes first international federation to expel athletes involved in Enhanced Games

World Aquatics has announced that it will expel athletes involved in the 2026 Enhanced Games which promotes performance-enhancing drugs that are prohibited by global anti-doping regulations

Read More

World Boxing to introduce compulsory sex testing from July

World Boxing has announced that it will implement compulsory sex testing for all boxers starting from July 2025

Read More

Judge soon to determine solo verdict in Canadian hockey sexual assault case after expelling jury

Judge, Justice Maria Carroccia, expelled the jury involved in a Canadian hockey sexual assault case due to a complaint about the defence attorneys’ behaviour, and will soon determine the verdict alone

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: