NFL ordered to pay $4.7 billion in Sunday Ticket lawsuit


NFL ordered to pay $4.7 billion in Sunday Ticket lawsuit

A California jury has found the US National Football League (NFL) violated antitrust laws and ordered it to pay $4.7bn in damages to customers who bought a package of its live games over satellite television. The jury ordered the league to pay $4bn in damages to the residential class and $96m in damages to the commercial class. Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could end up being liable for $14.39 billion.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the nine US circuit court of appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. “NFL Sunday Ticket” subscribers accused the league, its teams and its network partners of working together to sell the out-of-market sports package at an inflated price and restrict competition. 

“This case transcends football. This case matters,” plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday’s closing arguments. “It’s about justice. It’s about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV – that’s what they have. It’s about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can’t hide the truth and think you’re going to get away with it.”

The NFL said in a statement that it will appeal the verdict.

"We are disappointed with the jury's verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit. We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment," the league said.

"We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit. We thank the jury for their time and service and for the guidance and oversight from Judge [Philip] Gutierrez throughout the trial."

Post-trial motions will be heard July 31, including one to set aside the verdict. If the verdict isn't set aside, the NFL will appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court.

You may also like

View All

Enhanced Games sues World Aquatics, WADA and USA Swimming for $800m

The privately funded 2026 Enhanced Games set to take place in Las Vegas allows athletes to use performance enhancing substances without being subject to drug tests. It is now suing World Aquatics, the World Anti-Doping Agency and USA Swimming for $800m after accusing them of orchestrating an unlawful effort to discourage athletes from participating

Read More

Serena Williams latest sportsperson to promote GLP-1 weight loss medication, fuelling criticism

23-time Grand Slam tennis champion Serena Williams is the latest sportsperson to promote weight loss medication like Ozempic, fuelling criticism over possibly encouraging toxic beauty standards, discouraging healthy habits, and the fact that she has affiliated herself with drugs that the World Anti-Doping Agency added to its monitored substances list

Read More

UKAD employs an all-female team of Doping Control Personnel for the Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025

UKAD has employed an all-female team of Doping Control Personnel for World Rugby to assist with the Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025. The tournament also features the largest cohort of female coaches in the event’s history

Read More