NFL to stop racial bias when settling concussion lawsuits

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

The NFL has said that it will stop using a race-based formula which assumes black players have a lower cognitive function than their white counterparts, when settling concussion lawsuits.

The practice is known as “race norming” and assumed that black players started out with a lower cognitive function, this resulted in black players finding it harder to show a detriment as it was already assumed their cognitive function was lower than white players and was therefore harder for black players to qualify for a settlement award. Former player Ken Jenkins said “This is classic systemic racism. Just because I'm black, I wasn't born with fewer brain cells.”

Over 2000 former players have launched claims but less than 600 have received pay-outs. Two who were refused pay-outs under a $1billion brain injuries scheme are Kevin Henry and Najeh Davenport who launched a civil lawsuit over the race-norming. This lawsuit was thrown out and a settlement negotiation ordered before the judge called for a full report on race-norming, with players hoping that this will include a breakdown of all pay-outs by race.

NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said “Everyone agrees race-based norms should be replaced, but no off-the-shelf alternative exists and that's why these experts are working to solve this decades-old issue.” Race-norming was first established in the 1990’s after a study of a small number of black people in San Diego concluded that the group had lower cognitive function than the average white person but this study was not representative of black people today or of the rest of the country in the 1990’s.   

You can read the NFL statement here.

You may also like

View All

Pinned Article

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2026: Early Bird Tickets Now on Sale

Early Bird tickets for the Sport Resolutions 11th Annual Conference are now available. Join leading sport and legal professionals in London on 7 May 2026 for a full day of discussion, insight, and networking

Read More

Leading professionals turn down opportunity to have greater say in management of major tennis championships, claiming they are consistently ignored

The world’s top 10 male and female tennis players have turned down an offer from three out of four of the Grand Slams – with the Australian Open excluded - to establish a player council, claiming they are consistently ignored despite discussions

Read More

Mediation in Sports Disputes: A Global Perspective and Future Outlook

Sport Resolutions panel member Muiris Lyons reflects on new practitioner-led research into mediation in international sport, exploring why this highly effective process - with settlement rates of around 80% - remains underused, and how earlier, more consistent adoption could strengthen sports dispute resolution alongside arbitration.

Read More