RFU v Arran Perry

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Arran Perry has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

On 28 October 2019 Mr Arran Perry, a rugby union player registered with Leighton Buzzard RFC, provided a urine Sample Out-of-Competition at his home. The urine Sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for Oxandrolone and 3 of its metabolites. Mr Perry was subsequently charged on 20 December 2019 with a breach of Article 21.2.1 of the World Rugby Regulations for the Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in his Sample.

Mr Perry admitted the charge and so the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Mark Hovell, Blondel Thompson and Terry Crystal, imposed a period of Ineligibility of four years, running from 20 December 2019 until midnight on 19 December 2023.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

FIFA finds no evidence of misconduct by VAR official over controversial hand gesture

FIFA has cleared a World Cup official of making a white supremacist gesture, with the official stating that the gesture was “a subconscious twitch”

Read More

Fox Sports evades punishment after violating FIFA World Cup advertising rules

Fox Sports, U.S. television broadcaster, known for its sports programming, will evade punishment from FIFA after it violated the governing body’s advertising rules during the first match of the World Cup

Read More

Role Opportunity | Premier League Judicial Panel

The Premier League is seeking to add further members to its independent Judicial Panel to adjudicate independently on disciplinary cases and appeals

Read More