RFU v Arran Perry

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Arran Perry has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

On 28 October 2019 Mr Arran Perry, a rugby union player registered with Leighton Buzzard RFC, provided a urine Sample Out-of-Competition at his home. The urine Sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for Oxandrolone and 3 of its metabolites. Mr Perry was subsequently charged on 20 December 2019 with a breach of Article 21.2.1 of the World Rugby Regulations for the Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in his Sample.

Mr Perry admitted the charge and so the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Mark Hovell, Blondel Thompson and Terry Crystal, imposed a period of Ineligibility of four years, running from 20 December 2019 until midnight on 19 December 2023.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Boxer Jai Opetaia sues IBF for removing his cruiserweight world title

Australian boxer Jai Opetaia is suing the International Boxing Federation for removing his cruiserweight world title after his first fight with Zuffa Boxing, a professional boxing promotion

Read More

Sport Resolutions to administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court at Glasgow 2026

Sport Resolutions will administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court and Independent Tribunal at Glasgow 2026, providing independent dispute resolution support throughout the Games. Drawing on its Birmingham 2022 experience, Sport Resolutions will provide expert panels to resolve disciplinary, anti-doping, eligibility, safeguarding, and selection matters fairly and efficiently

Read More

UK Anti-Doping v Daphne Schrager

A decision in the case of UK Anti-Doping against Daphne Schrager has been issued by the National Anti-Doping Panel

Read More