Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Leigh Dearden


Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Leigh Dearden

A decision in the case of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Leigh Dearden has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP). 

On 23 March 2019 Leigh Dearden, a player registered with Lincoln RFC and the RFU, provided a urine sample.  The urine sample returned Adverse Analytical Findings for Drostanolone and a metabolite, 2 metabolites of Oxymetholone, and cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine.  Mr Dearden was subsequently charged with a breach of World Rugby Regulation 21.2.1 for the Presence of Prohibited Substances or their Metabolites or Markers on 31 May 2019.

Mr Dearden did not dispute the Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) and the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Christopher Quinlan QC, Blondel Thompson and Professor Dorian Haskard imposed a period of ineligibility of 4 years, running from 31 May 2019 until midnight on 30 May 2023.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

World Aquatics becomes first international federation to expel athletes involved in Enhanced Games

World Aquatics has announced that it will expel athletes involved in the 2026 Enhanced Games which promotes performance-enhancing drugs that are prohibited by global anti-doping regulations

Read More

World Boxing to introduce compulsory sex testing from July

World Boxing has announced that it will implement compulsory sex testing for all boxers starting from July 2025

Read More

Judge soon to determine solo verdict in Canadian hockey sexual assault case after expelling jury

Judge, Justice Maria Carroccia, expelled the jury involved in a Canadian hockey sexual assault case due to a complaint about the defence attorneys’ behaviour, and will soon determine the verdict alone

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: