Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Max Drage

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Max Drage has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

On 16 November 2019 Mr Drage provided an In-Competition urine Sample. The Sample returned Adverse Analytical Findings for 7 substances, 5 of which are classed as anabolic androgenic steroids. Mr Drage was subsequently charged on 10 January 2020 with committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV), with a further updated Notice of Charge having been issued on 13 February 2020.

Mr Drage did not dispute the ADRV and the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Ms Michelle Duncan as sole arbitrator, imposed a period of ineligibility of 4 years, running from 10 January 2020 until midnight on 9 January 2024.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

ITIA v Aleksei Mokrov

A decision in the case of the International Tennis Integrity Agency against Mr Aleksei Mokrov has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Former world number 2 tennis player Jabeur facing mental health battle due to demanding schedule

Former world number 2 tennis player Ons Jabeur has vocalised her mental health struggles due to a demanding schedule

Read More

FIDE to provide childcare support for elite players

As part of its “ChessMom” initiative, the International Chess Federation will provide childcare support for mothers competing in elite chess, returning in 2026 for the 46th Chess Olympiad in Uzbekistan

Read More