Fan led review into English football will consider ownership, finance and greater fan involvement

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A fan led review into English football is to be undertaken following the European Super League controversy, with the review considering ownership, finance and greater fan involvement.

The Government has brought the review forward following the controversy caused this week when the “top six” announced they would be joining the European Super League, before all withdrawing less than 72 hours later following significant backlash from fans, former players and the Government.

The actions of the six clubs have led to many calling for an independent regulator with others arguing that the Bundesliga 50 + 1 Rule should be adopted so that one commercial investor cannot own more than 49% of a club. The Government said “While foreign ownership has undoubtedly benefited the development of the game, the review will seek to test whether existing oversight is sufficient to protect the interests of the game.”

The review will be led by MP Tracy Crouch, other points that will be reviewed include the Owners' and Directors' Tests and the flow of money down the football pyramid from the Premier League. Sports Minister Nigel Huddleston said the fan led review “must be a watershed moment in our national game.”

The Premier League and FA will be conducting a full investigation into the recent controversy with there being outrage from the 14 remaining Premier League teams being extremely angry and calling for Government intervention.  Brighton chief executive Paul Barber said “Clearly the one thing we are very clear on is when we work in football, we work within the regulatory framework. We know there are rules we have to abide by and if these rules are breached there will be sanctions. In this situation, where the game has been damaged - this has been a PR catastrophe for the whole game - there have to be some consequences for that. The actions of the last 72 hours proves our framework has not been strong enough. There are so many people concerned by what could happen, we need more stringent control and clear sanctions for what would happen if anyone tried it again. The consequences could have been catastrophic.”

You can read the Government statement here and the review Terms of Reference here.

You may also like

View All

Moghees Ahmed v The Cricket Regulator

A decision in the case of Moghees Ahmed against The Cricket Regulator has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Jockey Kitts receives nine-year corruption ban

Jockey Dylan Kitts has received a nine-year corruption ban after he conspired alongside John Higgins, associate of the horse’s owner, to prevent the horse involved, Hillsin, from achieving its best position in 2023

Read More

Enhanced Games lawsuit against World Aquatics, WADA and USA Swimming dismissed

The antitrust lawsuit filed by the Enhanced Games against World Aquatics, the World Anti-Doping Agency and USA Swimming after it alleged that the organisations were preventing athletes from joining the Enhanced Games has been dismissed by the federal judge in New York

Read More