x
x
x
x

Mon, November 18, 2019

IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

Share

Recent News Articles

Tue, January 14, 2025

WADA seeks candidates for Independent Ethics Board member position

WADA is inviting applications for an Independent Member position on its Ethics Board, requiring legal qualifications and judicial experience. The role, starting in May 2025, is essential for upholding WADA's Code of Ethics and conducting investigations into alleged breaches

Read More

Mon, January 13, 2025

Sanctions issued due to abuse in Azerbaijani gymnastics

A four-year international investigation has exposed physical, verbal and psychological abuse of Azerbaijani rhythmic gymnasts, resulting in significant sanctions against the perpetrators and the Azerbaijan Gymnastics Federation itself

Read More

Fri, January 10, 2025

Four Women’s Championship clubs will trial allowing fans alcohol in stands

Four Women’s Championship clubs will trial allowing fans alcohol in stands which may result in more people attending the matches

Read More