NFL ordered to pay $4.7 billion in Sunday Ticket lawsuit


NFL ordered to pay $4.7 billion in Sunday Ticket lawsuit

A California jury has found the US National Football League (NFL) violated antitrust laws and ordered it to pay $4.7bn in damages to customers who bought a package of its live games over satellite television. The jury ordered the league to pay $4bn in damages to the residential class and $96m in damages to the commercial class. Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could end up being liable for $14.39 billion.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the nine US circuit court of appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. “NFL Sunday Ticket” subscribers accused the league, its teams and its network partners of working together to sell the out-of-market sports package at an inflated price and restrict competition. 

“This case transcends football. This case matters,” plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday’s closing arguments. “It’s about justice. It’s about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV – that’s what they have. It’s about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can’t hide the truth and think you’re going to get away with it.”

The NFL said in a statement that it will appeal the verdict.

"We are disappointed with the jury's verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit. We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment," the league said.

"We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit. We thank the jury for their time and service and for the guidance and oversight from Judge [Philip] Gutierrez throughout the trial."

Post-trial motions will be heard July 31, including one to set aside the verdict. If the verdict isn't set aside, the NFL will appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court.

You may also like

View All

Enhanced Games lawsuit against World Aquatics, WADA and USA Swimming dismissed

The antitrust lawsuit filed by the Enhanced Games against World Aquatics, the World Anti-Doping Agency and USA Swimming after it alleged that the organisations were preventing athletes from joining the Enhanced Games has been dismissed by the federal judge in New York

Read More

Ice hockey neck guards compulsory at 2026 Winter Olympic Games

For the first time, ice hockey neck guards will be made compulsory at the Winter Olympics by the International Ice Hockey Federation following the tragic death of player Adam Johnson

Read More

Sky Sports drops women’s sport TikTok account after only three days after its posts were described by followers as “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Sky Sports has dropped its women’s sport TikTok account Halo just days after its creation following criticism that its posts were “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Read More