Nigerian hurdler Glory Onome Nathaniel given 4 year ban


A decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal. Ms Nathaniel a Nigerian hurdler/sprinter was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) under the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules (ADR) after testing positive for the presence of stanozolol and its metabolites (3’-hydroxy-stanozolol, 4-hydroxy-stanozolol and 16β-hydroxy-stanozolol) on 25 October 2018. On 2 April 2019, a hearing was held before the Panel, comprised of Mr Michael J Beloff QC as the Sole Adjudicator. The Sole Adjudicator found that the Athlete had committed Anti-Doping Rule Violations pursuant to Article 2.1 ADR and Article 2.2 ADR and a four (4) year period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon the Athlete commencing on the date of the Award.  

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU's website please click here

Related Documents

  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal

You may also like

View All

PTPA Achieves Initial Success in Case Against ATP Tour

The Professional Tennis Players’ Association, founded by Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil, has been moderately successful in its lawsuit against the men’s ATP Tour

Read More

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP is now Sold Out

We’re excited to share that the Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 has reached full capacity!

Read More

The Governance of Football – is it broken and does it need fixing?

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: