RFU v Arran Perry


RFU v Arran Perry

A decision in the case of Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Arran Perry has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

On 28 October 2019 Mr Arran Perry, a rugby union player registered with Leighton Buzzard RFC, provided a urine Sample Out-of-Competition at his home. The urine Sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for Oxandrolone and 3 of its metabolites. Mr Perry was subsequently charged on 20 December 2019 with a breach of Article 21.2.1 of the World Rugby Regulations for the Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in his Sample.

Mr Perry admitted the charge and so the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Mark Hovell, Blondel Thompson and Terry Crystal, imposed a period of Ineligibility of four years, running from 20 December 2019 until midnight on 19 December 2023.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

PTPA Achieves Initial Success in Case Against ATP Tour

The Professional Tennis Players’ Association, founded by Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil, has been moderately successful in its lawsuit against the men’s ATP Tour

Read More

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP is now Sold Out

We’re excited to share that the Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 has reached full capacity!

Read More

The Governance of Football – is it broken and does it need fixing?

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: