World Athletics v Fernanda Martins

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Fernanda Martins has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 7 July 2021 the AIU issued Ms Martins with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation pursuant to Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the 2021 World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules after testing positive for the Prohibited Substance Enobosarm. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of Jeffrey Benz as sole arbitrator determined that Ms Martins did not intentionally use the Prohibited Substance and it entered her system through contamination. A two month period of Ineligibility was imposed on Ms Martins, backdated to the date of Provisional Suspension, 21 May 2021, therefore she is free to compete once more. 

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

Enhanced Games lawsuit against World Aquatics, WADA and USA Swimming dismissed

The antitrust lawsuit filed by the Enhanced Games against World Aquatics, the World Anti-Doping Agency and USA Swimming after it alleged that the organisations were preventing athletes from joining the Enhanced Games has been dismissed by the federal judge in New York

Read More

Ice hockey neck guards compulsory at 2026 Winter Olympic Games

For the first time, ice hockey neck guards will be made compulsory at the Winter Olympics by the International Ice Hockey Federation following the tragic death of player Adam Johnson

Read More

Sky Sports drops women’s sport TikTok account after only three days after its posts were described by followers as “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Sky Sports has dropped its women’s sport TikTok account Halo just days after its creation following criticism that its posts were “misogynistic” and “condescending”

Read More