x
x
x
x

Thu, December 21, 2023

World Athletics v James Mwangi Wangari

World Athletics v James Mwangi Wangari

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against James Mwangi Wangari has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 16 January 2023, the AIU issued Mr Wangari, a Kenyan road runner, with a Notice of Charge for committing two Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADVRs) for the Presence of Norandrosterone in the Sample provided In-Competition, on 6 November 2022 and the Use of a Prohibited Substance (Nandrolone). The Athlete had previously, on 23 September 2020, been found to have committed his first ADRV following an Adverse Analytical Finding for exogenous Testosterone and had received a four (4) year ban. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal was comprised of Mr Raj Parker as Sole Arbitrator. 

The Athlete argued that he had no choice but to accept the ADRV due to his limited financial means forcing him to waive his right to a B Sample analysis. Consequently, he argued that he bore No Fault of Negligence and that the Panel should, to that effect, consider the effective impossibility of the Athlete proving the source of Norandrosterone and conclude that the ADRV was not intentional and requested that only a four (4) year period of ineligibility be imposed. 

The Tribunal stated that the controversy was not whether the Athlete committed the ADRV, but whether the Athlete had intentionally committed the ADRV or whether he had No Fault or Negligence or No Significant Fault or Negligence and whether the period of Ineligibility should be reduced. The Tribunal concluded that the Athlete was not able to show, on a balance of probabilities, that the ADRV was committed unintentionally. As a result of this, the Tribunal found that the period of Ineligibility should be for eight (8) years. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal thereby determined that Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRV) had been established pursuant to Rule 2.1 and Rule 2.2 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules and a period of Ineligibility of eight (8) years is imposed on the Athlete. The period of Ineligibility commenced on the date of the decision, 7 December 2023, but credit was given for the period Mr Wangari was provisionally suspended, therefore running from 21 December 2022. Further, Mr Wangari’s results obtained at the 2022 EDP Porto Marathon were disqualified in accordance with Rules 9 and 10.1 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

Share

Recent News Articles

Wed, October 02, 2024

France is looking into broadening AI surveillance efforts beyond Paris in 2024

France is considering expanding AI surveillance beyond the Olympic Games, while human rights lawyers highlight the challenges posed by the unchecked growth of AI, which has become more apparent following the Paris 2024 Olympics

Read More

Tue, October 01, 2024

Sport Resolutions’ Contributions to the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games

In the lead-up to the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Sport Resolutions played a key role in ensuring fairness and integrity through athlete selection cases and operated an ad hoc independent tribunal for tennis events, supporting athletes and personnel throughout the Games

Read More

Mon, September 23, 2024

Prosecutors demand €1.9 million fine for Dentsu Group over Tokyo Olympics did-rigging

Public prosecutors have demanded that the advertising agency Dentsu Group be fined €1.9 million for violating antimonopoly laws by rigging bids related to the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and Paralympics, held in 2021

Read More