World Athletics v Omar Craddock

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Omar Craddock has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 13 November 2020 the AIU issued Mr Craddock with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation relating to Whereabouts Failures, consisting of two Missed Tests and a Filing Failure in a 12-month period.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of The Hon. Yves Fortier, PC, QC as sole arbitrator determined that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) was established pursuant to Article 2.4 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. As a result, a twenty month period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon Mr Craddock, ending at midnight on 13 July 2022.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

UK Athletics fined following conclusion of proceedings relating to 2017 athlete fatality

UK Athletics (UKA) has been fined £350,000 and ordered to pay £44,000 in costs after pleading guilty to corporate manslaughter in connection with the death of Emirati Paralympian Abdullah Hayayei during preparations for the 2017 World Para Athletics Championships in London. In sentencing, the court described the circumstances leading to the incident as "wholly avoidable"

Read More

IFAB introduces rule changes ahead of the 2026 World Cup

The International Football Association Board has introduced landmark rule changes which will be implemented from the 2026-27 season onwards as well as at the FIFA World Cup 2026 which commences on June 11 in the United States, Mexico and Canada

Read More

World Athletics v Patricia Álvarez Pérez

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Ms Patricia Álvarez Pérez has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal

Read More