WADA study shows no meaningful link between TUE’s and winning an Olympic medal

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

According to a study undertaken by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) there is no meaningful link between an athlete having a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) and winning an Olympic medal.

The study was undertaken by WADA Medical Director, Dr Alan Vernec, and WADA TUE Manager, David Healy, who studies the five summer and winter Olympics that occurred during the period of 2010 to 2018. The study aimed to determine whether or not those with TUE’s won more medals than those athletes without a TUE.

A TUE allows athletes to use an otherwise prohibited substance in order to treat a legitimate medical condition and must be granted by an anti-doping organisation before use in competition. Dr Vernec said that “The data showed that the number of athletes competing with valid TUEs at the selected Games was less than 1%. Furthermore, the analysis suggests that there is no meaningful association between competing with a TUE and the likelihood of winning a medal.”

Many factors were taken into account during the study such as countries having greater resources meaning that athletes would have better access to superior training facilities, medical and coaching. Overall, the study found that 2062 medals were awarded throughout the five studied Olympics with only 21 of these medals being won by athletes with a TUE.

You can access the full study here.

You may also like

View All

IJF lifts ban on Russian athletes competing under national flag

The International Judo Federation (IJF) has drawn criticism after lifting its restrictions on Russian athletes and allowing them to compete under Russia’s flag, despite the country remaining banned by the International Olympic Committee

Read More

Player from Norwegian football club failed drug test due to artificial pitch

A female player from Norwegian football club Vålerenga failed her drug test due to an artificial pitch, calling into question WADA’s policy on “strict liability”

Read More

Moghees Ahmed v The Cricket Regulator

A decision in the case of Moghees Ahmed against The Cricket Regulator has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More