World Athletics v Norah Jeruto


World Athletics v Norah Jeruto

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against Norah Jeruto has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 5 April 2023, the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) issued Ms Norah Jeruto, a long-distance runner from Kenya, with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADVR) for the Use of a Prohibited Substance and/or Prohibited Method pursuant to Rule 2.2 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules (ADR). This Notice of Charge was in connection with abnormalities in the haematological module of her Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), in particular the matter concerned several abnormalities detected in blood samples collected from the Athlete between 21 June 2016 and 2 May 2022. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal, comprised of Mr Charles Hollander KC, Mr Pedro Fida and Ms Hannu Kalkas, was appointed to hear this matter. 

The Tribunal analysed the ADRV, and the explanation given by the Athlete, which convinced the Tribunal. The Athlete justified the first ABP abnormality by stating that she suffers from bleeding ulcers associated with H. pylori, the leading cause of peptic ulcer disease, which has hospitalised her on multiple occasions. Because of this, the Athlete was prescribed a Pylotrip kit and other medicines to try to cure and ease the pain. As to the second ABP abnormality, the Athlete went to the hospital for a runny nose, dry cough and pain in her chest and was told to take Rhinathiol/ Promethazine and due to getting blisters on her lips was given Zytee RB. 

The Tribunal concluded that, regarding the first ABP abnormality, the withdrawal of blood cannot in itself constitute an attempt to administer blood and that although it could be seen as a preparation of an ADRV, it could not constitute an Attempt as that would also require the intent, at least, of reinfusion. Therefore, the Tribunal refused both the Use and the Attempted Use charges by the AIU. In the matter of the second ABP abnormality, the Tribunal was persuaded that the sample results might have also been explained by a bout of Covid-19 and on balance they could not state that the AIU had proven its case to the Panel’s comfortable satisfaction. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal thereby determined that no ADRV had been established pursuant to Rule 2.2 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. Consequently, the charges were dismissed, no period of Ineligibility was imposed on the athlete, no results were disqualified, and the Provisional Suspension was lifted with immediate effect. 

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

 

Related Documents

You may also like

View All

Retried American golfer Jack Nicklaus wins $50 million defamation lawsuit after LIV Golf misrepresentation claims

85-year-old former American professional golfer and golf course designer Jack Nicklaus has been awarded $50 million in a defamation lawsuit against Nicklaus Companies, owned by billionaire banker Howard Milstein, after Milstein and other Nicklaus Companies officials reportedly suggested that Nicklaus had considered becoming the face of the LIV Golf League, which is financed by Saudi Arabia, in a $750 million deal

Read More

Job Opportunity | Investigator - Sport Integrity

Sport Resolutions has an exciting opportunity for an individual to join its passionate, diverse and experienced case management team as an Investigator. The successful applicant will work primarily on Sport Integrity matters but may also assist with the development of the National Safeguarding Panel (NSP) and our wider safeguarding work. The Investigator will play a vital role in ensuring that disputes are managed fairly, efficiently and cost-effectively

Read More

Transgender fencer sues USA Fencing and USOPC over ban following Trump executive order

Transgender fencer, Dina Yukich, is suing USA Fencing, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Premier Fencing Club due to their compliance with U.S. president Donald Trump’s executive order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” which was signed in February

Read More