World Athletics v Blessing Okagbare

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision is the case of World Athletics against Blessing Okagbare has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal. 

On 20 September 2021, the AIU issued Ms Okagbare with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation under Article 2.1 and 2.2 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules (ADR) after testing positive for the Presence and Use of a Prohibited Substance. On the same date, the AIU also issued Ms Okagbare with a Notice of Rule 12 Proceedings, pursuant to Rule 5.7.4 of the Rules, for failing to comply with the AIU's demands in the content of an investigation. 

Ms Okagbare requested the matter be resolved before the Disciplinary Tribunal and a hearing was held on 31 January 2022. 

The Disciplinary Tribunal, consisting of Christopher Quinlan QC as sole arbitrator, heard both charges and determined that Ms Okagbare has committed an Anti-Doping Rule Violation pursuant to Article 2.1 and 2.2 of the ADR, resulting in a five (5) year period of Ineligibility and found that the Athlete failed to comply with the Demand, imposing a consecutive period of Ineligibility of five (5) years. The total period of Ineligibility of ten (10) years is imposed on the Athlete, commencing on 31 July 2021.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side 

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

UK Anti-Doping is recruiting 2 Non-Executive Directors

UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) is looking to recruit two new board Directors to fill vacancies arising in June 2026 when two current members complete their second terms on the UKAD Board

Read More

Barcelona expresses disappointment following La Liga’s decision to cancel its match against Villarreal in Miami

Barcelona has published a statement on La Liga’s, a professional Spanish football league, decision to cancel its match against Villarreal in Miami, expressing both acceptance and disappointment over a “missed opportunity to expand”

Read More

Retried American golfer Jack Nicklaus wins $50 million defamation lawsuit after LIV Golf misrepresentation claims

85-year-old former American professional golfer and golf course designer Jack Nicklaus has been awarded $50 million in a defamation lawsuit against Nicklaus Companies, owned by billionaire banker Howard Milstein, after Milstein and other Nicklaus Companies officials reportedly suggested that Nicklaus had considered becoming the face of the LIV Golf League, which is financed by Saudi Arabia, in a $750 million deal

Read More