IAAF v Jacob Kibet Chulyo Kendagor

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Jacob Kibet Chulyo Kendagor has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 5th July 2019 Mr Kendagor was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with a violation of Article 2.3 of the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules for Refusing or Failing to Submit to Sample Collection.

The panel, consisting of Charles Hollander QC as the sole arbitrator, found that the athlete had not committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.3 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that the charge would be dismissed. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

You may also like

View All

Los Angeles 2028 Olympic organisers generated over $2 billion in commercial revenue so far

The Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games organising committee have generated over $2 billion in domestic sponsorship revenue so far, meaning it may become one of the most commercially successful Olympics in history

Read More

World Athletics v Sheila Chelangat

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against Sheila Chelangat (the Athlete) has been issued by the WA Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal (DAT)

Read More

WNBA proposes $1 million base salary along with compensation tied more closely to the league’s revenue

In the Women’s National Basketball Association’s latest collective bargaining agreement update, it has proposed a $1 million base salary for athletes on max deals, which is the largest contract a player can sign, partly determined by their years of service in the league, and has agreed to increase compensation in line with revenue growth

Read More