NFL teams face fines and lost draft picks for questioning draft prospects about sexuality

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

The NFL has warned teams that they could face large fines and lose draft picks if they conduct themselves unprofessionally in interviews with draft prospects by asking personal questions such as their sexuality.

The league told teams that if a club representative acted “disrespectful, inappropriate, or unprofessional” during an interview then draft picks and minimum fines of $150,000 could be imposed. The employee responsible for asking the questions could also be fined or suspended by the league.

There has been a history of inappropriate questions in interviews with draft prospects such as former Miami Dolphins general manager Jeff Ireland asking future first round pick Dez Bryant if his mother was a prostitute. In 2016 cornerback Elia Apple was asked his sexual preference by an Atlanta Falcons coach and in 2018 Derrius Guice was asked about his sexuality and if his mother was a prostitute.

Former tight end Benjamin Watson said “I can remember sitting in a dark room with a huge spotlight. There’s a seat there like you’re being interrogated for a crime and all the front-office staff is in the back in the shadows and you can’t see them. The guy grabbed my wrist and he’s like: ‘I can feel your pulse, so I know if you’re lying to me. Have you ever smoked marijuana?’ I said: ‘No.’ I really hadn’t. I’ve never smoked. He said: ‘I think you’re lying. I can feel your pulse. Are you lying to us?’ I said: ‘No, I’m not.’ So for a minute, I thought I actually did smoke marijuana and maybe I need to confess to a crime that I didn’t commit. But these sorts of tactics that are happening at the combine and that are not being monitored definitely need to be done away with.”

The NFL said “All clubs should ensure that prospective draft picks are afforded a respectful and professional NFL environment – one that is consistent with state and federal law and our shared commitment to respect, diversity and inclusion. The same is true of free agents whom your club may consider signing. It is also important for your club to reinforce to prospective players the value your club places on character and the standards of conduct expected of everyone associated with the NFL.”

You may also like

View All

Pinned Article

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2026: Early Bird Tickets Now on Sale

Early Bird tickets for the Sport Resolutions 11th Annual Conference are now available. Join leading sport and legal professionals in London on 7 May 2026 for a full day of discussion, insight, and networking

Read More

Leading professionals turn down opportunity to have greater say in management of major tennis championships, claiming they are consistently ignored

The world’s top 10 male and female tennis players have turned down an offer from three out of four of the Grand Slams – with the Australian Open excluded - to establish a player council, claiming they are consistently ignored despite discussions

Read More

Mediation in Sports Disputes: A Global Perspective and Future Outlook

Sport Resolutions panel member Muiris Lyons reflects on new practitioner-led research into mediation in international sport, exploring why this highly effective process - with settlement rates of around 80% - remains underused, and how earlier, more consistent adoption could strengthen sports dispute resolution alongside arbitration.

Read More