Wed, February 07, 2024

International Tennis Integrity Agency v Tara Moore & Barbara Gática

International Tennis Integrity Agency v Tara Moore & Barbara Gática

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) against Tara Moore and Barbara Gática has been issued by the Independent Panel.

On 6 April 2022, during the Women’s Tennis Association 250 Copa Colsanitas tournament in Bogotá, Colombia, Ms Moore, an English tennis player, and Ms Gática, a Chilean tennis player, each provided In-Competition urine samples that resulted in Adverse Analytical Findings. The analysis of Ms Moore’s sample identified the presence of two Prohibited Substances, Boldenone and Nandrolone. Ms Gática’s sample was also analysed and Boldenone was found to be present. On 13 January 2023, both players were sent Notices of Charge for committing Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRV) for Presence and Use of the above-noted Prohibited Substances. 

The Independent Tribunal, comprised of Mr William Norris KC (Chair), Professor Dorian Haskard, and Ms Abigail Gauci, was appointed to hear this matter. 

Both players admitted to the Presence of the Prohibited Substances in their systems but denied that the Presence was caused by deliberate doping. The players justified the Presence; alleging that it had probably resulted from their consumption of meat in various restaurants in Bogotá, including at the tournament venue. The Independent Tribunal was especially convinced by the scientific evidence that proved that Boldenone and Nandrolone were regularly used in Colombian meat production, that three (3) out of the twenty-one (21) players tested at this event tested positive for Boldenone, and that those three players had no known link between them other than participating in the same tournament and likely all eating at the tournament venue. 

The Tribunal concluded that it is probable that both players returned Adverse Analytical Findings because they consumed contaminated meat. Further the Tribunal stated that the players bore No Fault or Negligence as there is no basis for saying that the risk of contamination should have been known by the players. 

The Independent Tribunal thereby determined that no ADRV had been established pursuant to Rules 2.1 and 2.2 of the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme. Consequently, the charges were dismissed, no period of Ineligibility was imposed on the players, no results were disqualified, and the Provisional Suspensions applied to each were lifted with immediate effect. 

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the International Tennis Integrity Agency’s Independent Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.


Recent News Articles

Fri, February 16, 2024

World Athletics v Charles Karanja Kamau

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against Charles Karanja Kamau has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal

Read More

Thu, February 15, 2024

International Investigations in Sport: Catching Wrongdoers

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2024

Read More

Tue, February 13, 2024

Ukraine’s Olympic Committee asks IOC to investigate Russian and Belarusian athletes who are due to compete as “neutral athletes” at the Paris 2024 Games

The Ukraine Olympic Committee claims some neutral athletes should not be allowed to compete at the Paris Games because of their support for "Russian aggression"

Read More