World Athletics v Gomathi Marimuthu

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Gomathi Marimuthu has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 16 September 2019 the AIU issued Ms Marimuthu with a Notice of Charge for an Adverse Analytical Finding for 19-NA, a prohibited substance.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of Anna Bordiugova, Dennis Koolaard and Paul Ciucur determined that an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) was established pursuant to Article 2.1 and Article 2.2 of the 2019 IAAF Rules, and as a result, a four-year period of ineligibility is imposed. Ms Marimuthu’s competition results between 18 March 2019 and 17 May 2019 are disqualified.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

WNBA proposes $1 million base salary along with compensation tied more closely to the league’s revenue

In the Women’s National Basketball Association’s latest collective bargaining agreement update, it has proposed a $1 million base salary for athletes on max deals, which is the largest contract a player can sign, partly determined by their years of service in the league, and has agreed to increase compensation in line with revenue growth

Read More

IJF lifts ban on Russian athletes competing under national flag

The International Judo Federation (IJF) has drawn criticism after lifting its restrictions on Russian athletes and allowing them to compete under Russia’s flag, despite the country remaining banned by the International Olympic Committee

Read More

Player from Norwegian football club failed drug test due to artificial pitch

A female player from Norwegian football club Vålerenga failed her drug test due to an artificial pitch, calling into question WADA’s policy on “strict liability”

Read More