Ellis Richards v UKAD (First Instance & Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the appeal of Ellis Richards v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP), along with the first instance decision.

On 13 August 2018 Mr Ellis Richards, a rugby union player at Cardiff Metropolitan University Rugby Football Club, provided a urine Sample Out of Competition.  The next day, and in the days that followed, discussions were held between Mr Richards and his Strength and Conditioning Coach, where it is was alleged Mr Richards admitted to taking a Prohibited Substance (Clenbuterol). 

On 04 October 2018, Mr Richards was informed that no Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods were detected in the analysis of the urine Sample.  An interview was held between Mr Richards and UKAD on 28 November 2018, where the issue of whether Clenbuterol had been taken arose.  Mr Richards accepted that he had made the admission, but stated that he was unsure as to the substance he had actually taken, and that the Clenbuterol reference had been speculative.

Mr Richards was subsequently charged on 07 May 2019, with a breach of ADR Article 2.2 for the Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method in his Sample.  The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Mark Hovell, Professor Kitrina Douglas, and Professor Gordon McInnes, found Mr Richards had breached ADR Article 2.2. A period of Ineligibility of four years was imposed under ADR Article 10.2.

On 16 March 2020, Mr Richards appealed the NADP’s decision.  The NADP Appeal Tribunal, consisting of William Norris QC, Professor Dorian Haskard and Dr Tim Rogers upheld the NADP Tribunal’s decision, and Mr Richards’ appeal was dismissed. His period of ineligibility runs from 7 May 2019, the date of his Provisional Suspension.

Copies of the full decisions can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

ATP to introduce new heat policy in 2026 following several mid-match retirements this season, aligning itself with the WTA

The ATP Tour will introduce a new heat policy starting from the 2026 season following the mid-match retirements of 7 players as a result of extremely high temperatures and humidity at the Shanghai Masters this season

Read More

Study by ParalympicsGB reveals how effective the Paris 2024 Paralympic Games was in encouraging disabled people to become more active

Following a poll conducted before and after the Paris 2024 Paralympic Games, it has been revealed that the confidence levels of disabled people within sport and physical activity are the lowest, compared to in other areas of their life such as work and education, but that the Paralympic Games helped boost confidence

Read More

FIFPRO study finds playing-time gap between top and lower-ranked women’s teams is increasing injury risks on both sides

Research by FIFPRO, the International Federation of Professional Footballers, has drawn attention to a “two-tier ecosystem” within women’s football where top team players have overloaded schedules whereas those lower down the rankings are facing “underload,” which is increasing injury risks for both sides 

Read More