Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Boxer Jai Opetaia sues IBF for removing his cruiserweight world title

Australian boxer Jai Opetaia is suing the International Boxing Federation for removing his cruiserweight world title after his first fight with Zuffa Boxing, a professional boxing promotion

Read More

Sport Resolutions to administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court at Glasgow 2026

Sport Resolutions will administer the Commonwealth Sport Federation Court and Independent Tribunal at Glasgow 2026, providing independent dispute resolution support throughout the Games. Drawing on its Birmingham 2022 experience, Sport Resolutions will provide expert panels to resolve disciplinary, anti-doping, eligibility, safeguarding, and selection matters fairly and efficiently

Read More

UK Anti-Doping v Daphne Schrager

A decision in the case of UK Anti-Doping against Daphne Schrager has been issued by the National Anti-Doping Panel

Read More