Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Sport Resolutions strengthens commitment to gender equity through Brighton Plus Helsinki Declaration

Sport Resolutions joins the global movement for gender equity, signing the Brighton plus Helsinki Declaration 

Read More

UK Anti-Doping is looking to hire a lawyer

UK Anti-Doping is recruiting a Lawyer to join its Legal and Regulatory Affairs Directorate and play an active role in maintaining an efficient Case Management function

Read More

World Athletics v Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Mr Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal

Read More