Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Sunderland and Switzerland captain removed from Nations League team after it is revealed he allegedly obtained a fake coronavirus vaccination certificate

Granit Xhaka, Sunderland and Switzerland captain, has been removed from his Nations League team after it was revealed that he allegedly obtained a fake coronavirus vaccination certificate in 2022

Read More

ITIA v Romeo Arcuschin

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency against Romeo Arcuschin has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Sydney Sweeney betting advert prompts discussion over women’s sport

Alexis Ohanian, founder of ATHLOS, a major all-female track and field event which is making its London debut on 18 September, has commented on the controversary surrounding actress Sydney Sweeney’s recent advertisement for a sports betting company, which has prompted debate over the portrayal of women and athletes

Read More