Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Jockey Kitts receives nine-year corruption ban

Jockey Dylan Kitts has received a nine-year corruption ban after he conspired alongside John Higgins, associate of the horse’s owner, to prevent the horse involved, Hillsin, from achieving its best position in 2023

Read More

Enhanced Games lawsuit against World Aquatics, WADA and USA Swimming dismissed

The antitrust lawsuit filed by the Enhanced Games against World Aquatics, the World Anti-Doping Agency and USA Swimming after it alleged that the organisations were preventing athletes from joining the Enhanced Games has been dismissed by the federal judge in New York

Read More

Ice hockey neck guards compulsory at 2026 Winter Olympic Games

For the first time, ice hockey neck guards will be made compulsory at the Winter Olympics by the International Ice Hockey Federation following the tragic death of player Adam Johnson

Read More