Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Holiday Office Closure

Season’s greetings from the Sport Resolutions team! Our office will be closed over the holidays and reopen on 2 January 2026

Read More

CEO’s Review of the Year

Chief Executive Richard Harry reviews Sport Resolutions' achievements during 2025

Read More

Scottish Government commits up to £9.25 million to 2027 Tour de France Grand Départ

The Scottish government will pay up to £9.25 million to host the start of the men’s Tour de France on Saturday 3 July 2027. Competitors will depart from Edinburgh, with the first three stages covering Scotland, England and Wales, before reaching France in a historic multi-nation start

Read More