Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Triple gold medallist heptathlete Nafi Thiam in dispute with Belgian Athletics

Just days before the World Athletics Championships Tokyo25 heptathlon, triple gold medallist Nafi Thiam has entered into a public dispute with Belgian Athletics, accusing the federation of blocking her from joining its official pre-camp and failing to accredit her physiotherapist

Read More

Sport Resolutions to continue supporting World Athletics at Tokyo 25 Championships

Sport Resolutions will support World Athletics during World Athletics Championships Tokyo 2025 by coordinating an independent ad hoc Disciplinary Tribunal panel to consider any expedited matters arising from the event

Read More

Referee to wear body camera in Serie A match

The referee for the Serie A match between Juventus and Inter Milan will wear a body camera for the first time in the Italian league

Read More