Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

ITA to implement its new testing approach during Tour de France

The International Testing Agency will collect around 600 in-competition samples during the Tour de France and over 360 out-of-competition tests have been conducted on riders expected to compete, as part of its new testing approach 

Read More

US Supreme Court enables individual states to bar transgender athletes

The Supreme Court of the United States has enabled individual states to impose restrictions on transgender student athletes

Read More

Alyssa Thomas criticises WNBA after receiving death threats and racism following incident with Caitlin Clark

Phoenix Mercury player, Alyssa Thomas, has criticised the Women’s National Basketball Association for its initial silence after she received death threats and racism following her one-game suspension for punching Caitlin Clark’s throat which Thomas claims was a “complete accident” that she “didn’t even know took place until after the game”

Read More