Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

WRU plans to cut the number of professional clubs from four to two

The Welsh Rugby Union plans to cut the number of its professional clubs from four to two, insisting that this is vital to protect the game

Read More

World Cup final to be the most attended women’s rugby match in history

Women’s Rugby World Cup organisers have announced that the tournament’s final will be the most attended women’s rugby match in history with 82,000 attendees expected in Twickenham

Read More

ITIA v Teso

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) against Kaili Demi Teso has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More