Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

ITIA v Aleksei Mokrov

A decision in the case of the International Tennis Integrity Agency against Mr Aleksei Mokrov has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Former world number 2 tennis player Jabeur facing mental health battle due to demanding schedule

Former world number 2 tennis player Ons Jabeur has vocalised her mental health struggles due to a demanding schedule

Read More

FIDE to provide childcare support for elite players

As part of its “ChessMom” initiative, the International Chess Federation will provide childcare support for mothers competing in elite chess, returning in 2026 for the 46th Chess Olympiad in Uzbekistan

Read More