Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

WADA shares final drafts of the 2027 World Anti-Doping Code and International Standards and related documents

The World Anti-Doping Agency has shared its proposed final drafts of the 2027 World Anti-Doping Code and International Standards

Read More

Canadian Olympic and Paralympic Committees are calling for sport betting tax revenue to be reinvested into elite sport

The Canadian Olympic Committee and Canadian Paralympic Committee are calling for sport betting tax revenue to be reinvested into elite sport to help resolve the country’s funding crisis

Read More

Women in Sports Arbitration: Pathways and Perspectives

Join us during London Arbitration Week for an engaging panel with female arbitrators and professionals involved in arbitration processes, sharing their journeys, experiences, and insights into building careers in sports arbitration

Read More