Nigerian hurdler Glory Onome Nathaniel given 4 year ban


A decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal. Ms Nathaniel a Nigerian hurdler/sprinter was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) under the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules (ADR) after testing positive for the presence of stanozolol and its metabolites (3’-hydroxy-stanozolol, 4-hydroxy-stanozolol and 16β-hydroxy-stanozolol) on 25 October 2018. On 2 April 2019, a hearing was held before the Panel, comprised of Mr Michael J Beloff QC as the Sole Adjudicator. The Sole Adjudicator found that the Athlete had committed Anti-Doping Rule Violations pursuant to Article 2.1 ADR and Article 2.2 ADR and a four (4) year period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon the Athlete commencing on the date of the Award.  

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU's website please click here

Related Documents

  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal

You may also like

View All

WADA publishes stakeholder and athlete feedback from third phase of 2027 Code review

WADA has published its stakeholder feedback from the Third Consultation Phase of the 2027 WADA Code and International Standards Update Process and from the Athlete-Centered Consultation on the same subject

Read More

UPenn reaches settlement with Trump admin regarding transgender participation

The University of Pennsylvania will prohibit transgender women from the women’s sport category after reaching a settlement with the Trump administration

Read More

World Athletics v Wilfried Happio

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Wilfried Happio has been issued by the World Athletics Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: