Nigerian hurdler Glory Onome Nathaniel given 4 year ban


A decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal. Ms Nathaniel a Nigerian hurdler/sprinter was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) under the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules (ADR) after testing positive for the presence of stanozolol and its metabolites (3’-hydroxy-stanozolol, 4-hydroxy-stanozolol and 16β-hydroxy-stanozolol) on 25 October 2018. On 2 April 2019, a hearing was held before the Panel, comprised of Mr Michael J Beloff QC as the Sole Adjudicator. The Sole Adjudicator found that the Athlete had committed Anti-Doping Rule Violations pursuant to Article 2.1 ADR and Article 2.2 ADR and a four (4) year period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon the Athlete commencing on the date of the Award.  

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU's website please click here

Related Documents

  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal
  • IAAF v Glory Onome NathanielA decision in the matter of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Ms Glory Onome Nathaniel has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal

You may also like

View All

The Open to employ Spidercam on 18th green at Portrush

For the first time in golf history, The Open will utilise Spidercam technology, and it will be used on the 18th green at the Royal Portrush Golf Club in Northern Ireland

Read More

ECHR declares Semenya was violated by Swiss Supreme Court

Europe’s top court, the European Court of Human Rights, has declared that DSD athlete and double 800m Olympic champion Caster Semenya was not given the right to a fair hearing by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in 2020 after World Athletics barred her from competing

Read More

Table Tennis England Transgender Policy consultation open

Table Tennis England has devised a Transgender Policy and is seeking feedback via a consultation period which is open until 20 July 2025

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: