ITF v Shoshyna

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of International Tennis Federation (ITF) against Anastasiya Shoshyna has been issued by the ITF Independent Panel.

On 30 November 2020, the ITF issued Ms Shoshyna with a Notice of Charge for the Presence of stanozolol, in a Sample collected In-Competition on 26 October 2020.

An Independent Tribunal was appointed to determine this matter, comprised of Professor Ulrich Haas (Chair), Joëlle Monlouis and Professor Dorian Haskard. The Tribunal found that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation had been committed by Ms Shoshyna pursuant to Article 2.1 of the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme, resulting in a four (4) year period of Ineligibility commencing on 26 October 2020, the date of Sample collection.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the ITF Independent Panel.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

You may also like

View All

ITIA v Romeo Arcuschin

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency against Romeo Arcuschin has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Sydney Sweeney betting advert prompts discussion over women’s sport

Alexis Ohanian, founder of ATHLOS, a major all-female track and field event which is making its London debut on 18 September, has commented on the controversary surrounding actress Sydney Sweeney’s recent advertisement for a sports betting company, which has prompted debate over the portrayal of women and athletes

Read More

LA28 Olympic and Paralympic Games to potentially generate $40 billion

According to a new report by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games could potentially generate up to $40 billion and create over 200,000 jobs across Greater LA

Read More