Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)


Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

PTPA Achieves Initial Success in Case Against ATP Tour

The Professional Tennis Players’ Association, founded by Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil, has been moderately successful in its lawsuit against the men’s ATP Tour

Read More

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP is now Sold Out

We’re excited to share that the Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 has reached full capacity!

Read More

The Governance of Football – is it broken and does it need fixing?

SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT | Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2025 in association with Winston & Strawn LLP

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: