Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Pinned Article

Sport Resolutions Annual Conference 2026: Tickets Now on Sale

Tickets for the Sport Resolutions 11th Annual Conference are now available. Join leading sport and legal professionals in London on 7 May 2026 for a full day of discussion, insight, and networking

Read More

Union Berlin’s Director of Football states abuse of new female head coach Marie-Louise Eta is ‘embarrassing’ and ‘insane’

Union Berlin’s Director of Football has stated that the abuse of new female head coach Marie-Louise Eta is ‘embarrassing’ and ‘insane’

Read More

Speaker Line-up Announced: Spending Limits in Sport – Purpose, Enforcement and Legal Realities

The full speaker line-up has now been confirmed for this session on spending limits in sport. Moderated by Manish Bhasin, the panel will bring together leading voices from across the industry to explore the purpose, enforcement and legal realities of salary caps and financial controls

Read More