Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)


A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

Related Documents

You may also like

View All

Chinese swimmers top anti-doping tests as World Championships begin in Singapore

Chinese swimmers have undergone more anti-doping tests this year than swimmers from any other country ahead of the World Aquatics Championships in Singapore this month, according to a report by the Aquatics Integrity Unit

Read More

The Open to employ Spidercam on 18th green at Portrush

For the first time in golf history, The Open will utilise Spidercam technology, and it will be used on the 18th green at the Royal Portrush Golf Club in Northern Ireland

Read More

ECHR declares Semenya was violated by Swiss Supreme Court

Europe’s top court, the European Court of Human Rights, has declared that DSD athlete and double 800m Olympic champion Caster Semenya was not given the right to a fair hearing by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in 2020 after World Athletics barred her from competing

Read More

Newsletter Signup

Please enter your email address below: