Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

FIFA president to possibly expand 2030 World Cup to 64 teams

FIFA president, Gianni Infantino, will possibly expand this year’s 48-team World Cup tournament to 64 teams by 2030 

Read More

Job Opportunity: Case Manager (International)

Sport Resolutions has an exciting opportunity for an individual to join its skilled, diverse and experienced case management team to assist, primarily, with international referrals.

Read More

IOC provisionally lifts suspension of Russian Olympic Committee

The International Olympic Committee has provisionally lifted the suspension of the Russian Olympic Committee, which was implemented in 2023, since the Russian committee no longer has, as its members, any regional sports organisations in territories falling under the jurisdiction of the National Olympic Committee of Ukraine

Read More