Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

UK Anti-Doping is looking to hire a lawyer

UK Anti-Doping is recruiting a Lawyer to join its Legal and Regulatory Affairs Directorate and play an active role in maintaining an efficient Case Management function

Read More

World Athletics v Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Mr Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal

Read More

CFRU v West Bromwich Albion FC

The full decision in the case of CFRU v West Bromwich Albion FC has been published by the Independent Club Financial Review Panel (CFRP)

Read More