Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Pinned Article

Sports Arbitration: More Than Just Lawyers - Is It Time to Rethink Who Decides?

Join us during London Arbitration Week for a panel discussion exploring what makes sports dispute resolution trusted, effective and fit for the future

Read More

Women footballers most likely to consider retiring early due to financial and mental health reasons

Women football players are most likely to consider retiring early due to financial and mental health issues, with employment standards failing to keep pace with a boom in certain areas, as reported by FIFPRO

Read More

Women’s Super League to wait until 2029 for full-time referees, with increased funding to support officials’ development

The Women Super League, the highest level of women's football in England, is set to receive additional investment in match officiating, with full-time referees expected to be introduced in 2029

Read More