Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Wimbledon increases prize money by 20%

Wimbledon will increase its prize money by 20%, the biggest rise in its history, and even though top players argue that this is inadequate because it is still less than 16% of the tournament’s revenue, it has been welcomed temporarily since it shows “a signal of intent”

Read More

Haiti forced to change kit just before the World Cup after FIFA deemed its jerseys to be too political

Haiti has been forced by FIFA to wear new jerseys just before the start of the World Cup after the global governing body deemed its jerseys to be too political, causing some to accuse FIFA of being hypocritical following its own recent actions

Read More

Durham’s WSL2 team to “cease operations” if urgent funding not received

Durham’s Women’s Super League 2 team has stated that it will have to “cease operations” if urgent funding is not received within the next 21 days

Read More