World Athletics v Omar Craddock

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Omar Craddock has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 13 November 2020 the AIU issued Mr Craddock with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation relating to Whereabouts Failures, consisting of two Missed Tests and a Filing Failure in a 12-month period.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of The Hon. Yves Fortier, PC, QC as sole arbitrator determined that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) was established pursuant to Article 2.4 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. As a result, a twenty month period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon Mr Craddock, ending at midnight on 13 July 2022.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

Triple gold medallist heptathlete Nafi Thiam in dispute with Belgian Athletics

Just days before the World Athletics Championships Tokyo25 heptathlon, triple gold medallist Nafi Thiam has entered into a public dispute with Belgian Athletics, accusing the federation of blocking her from joining its official pre-camp and failing to accredit her physiotherapist

Read More

Sport Resolutions to continue supporting World Athletics at Tokyo 25 Championships

Sport Resolutions will support World Athletics during World Athletics Championships Tokyo 2025 by coordinating an independent ad hoc Disciplinary Tribunal panel to consider any expedited matters arising from the event

Read More

Referee to wear body camera in Serie A match

The referee for the Serie A match between Juventus and Inter Milan will wear a body camera for the first time in the Italian league

Read More