World Athletics v Omar Craddock

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Omar Craddock has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 13 November 2020 the AIU issued Mr Craddock with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation relating to Whereabouts Failures, consisting of two Missed Tests and a Filing Failure in a 12-month period.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of The Hon. Yves Fortier, PC, QC as sole arbitrator determined that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) was established pursuant to Article 2.4 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. As a result, a twenty month period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon Mr Craddock, ending at midnight on 13 July 2022.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

ITIA v Romeo Arcuschin

A decision in the case of International Tennis Integrity Agency against Romeo Arcuschin has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

Sydney Sweeney betting advert prompts discussion over women’s sport

Alexis Ohanian, founder of ATHLOS, a major all-female track and field event which is making its London debut on 18 September, has commented on the controversary surrounding actress Sydney Sweeney’s recent advertisement for a sports betting company, which has prompted debate over the portrayal of women and athletes

Read More

LA28 Olympic and Paralympic Games to potentially generate $40 billion

According to a new report by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games could potentially generate up to $40 billion and create over 200,000 jobs across Greater LA

Read More