World Athletics v Omar Craddock

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Omar Craddock has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 13 November 2020 the AIU issued Mr Craddock with a Notice of Charge for committing an Anti-Doping Rule Violation relating to Whereabouts Failures, consisting of two Missed Tests and a Filing Failure in a 12-month period.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of The Hon. Yves Fortier, PC, QC as sole arbitrator determined that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) was established pursuant to Article 2.4 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. As a result, a twenty month period of Ineligibility has been imposed upon Mr Craddock, ending at midnight on 13 July 2022.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

Sport England impels Ofcom to address abuse of female footballers

The chair of Sport England Chris Boardman has urged Ofcom to address the recent online abuse targeted at the England Women’s football team

Read More

World Athletics v Madhuri Kale

A decision has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal in the case of World Athletics against Ms Madhuri Kale

Read More

Judge stays former Penn swimmers’ Title IX lawsuit

On Tuesday, federal judge William Young halted court proceedings on a lawsuit brought by three former University of Pennsylvania swimmers after the university allowed a transgender athlete to compete in the 2022 Women’s Ivy League Swimming and Diving Championships

Read More