Mr Maxim Agapitov (RUS) v. Mr Phil Andrews (USA)

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

The independent Ethics and Disciplinary Commission (EDC) of the International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) has issued its first decision, which involved the President of the Russian Weightlifting Federation, Acting President of the European Weightlifting Federation (EWF) and member of the IWF Executive Board Maxim Agapitov (complainant) and USA Weightlifting Chief Executive Officer Phil Andrews (respondent).

The EDC determined the matter in accordance with the IWF Constitution (2017) and the EDC Interim Rules (2021), and a copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

Sport Resolutions acts as a secretariat to the EDC of the International Weightlifting Federation. The members of the EDC were appointed by the IWF. More information about the EDC can be found here

You may also like

View All

Ohio State University reaches further $100 million settlement with Richard Strauss survivors

Ohio State University will pay $100 million to hundreds of former students, including former student-athletes, who were sexually assaulted by former campus doctor Richard Strauss, who died in 2005

Read More

We’re Hiring | Case Manager – National (Football)

Sport Resolutions has an exciting opportunity for an individual to join its passionate and experienced National case management team to assist with the administration of domestic matters including football disciplinary procedures, Olympic and Paralympic disputes, and anti-doping rule violations

Read More

UK Athletics fined following conclusion of proceedings relating to 2017 athlete fatality

UK Athletics (UKA) has been fined £350,000 and ordered to pay £44,000 in costs after pleading guilty to corporate manslaughter in connection with the death of Emirati Paralympian Abdullah Hayayei during preparations for the 2017 World Para Athletics Championships in London. In sentencing, the court described the circumstances leading to the incident as "wholly avoidable"

Read More