National Sports Reviews (UK)

Generally speaking, an investigation is a fact-finding exercise as to whether there is evidence to support allegation(s), and that in light of the evidence gathered, it is more likely that the conduct took place, or not.

On the other hand, a review often deals with historical allegations, and whether or not those individual(s) or organisation(s) to whom those allegations were made properly investigated and took action at the time they were raised.

An independent review may be appropriate where there are concerns about how a matter was handled, where lessons need to be learned, or where confidence in governance or decision-making has been affected. Reviews are often commissioned following complaints, internal concerns, or external scrutiny, even where no formal investigation is required.

Reviews are led by suitably experienced and independent individuals appointed from Sport Resolutions’ panel. Reviewers are selected based on the subject matter, the governance context, and the skills and experience required to assess the relevant processes or decisions.

The reviewer acts independently of the commissioning organisation. Sport Resolutions undertakes conflict checks and ensures the review is conducted in accordance with agreed Terms of Reference, without influence over findings or recommendations.

Sport Resolutions provides independent administrative and secretariat support, helping to manage the process efficiently and consistently. This may include coordinating interviews, collating documentation, and managing communications, while the reviewer retains responsibility for the analysis, findings, and recommendations.

A review may involve consideration of relevant policies, documents, correspondence, and decision-making records, as well as interviews with key stakeholders. The precise scope and methodology are determined by the agreed Terms of Reference.

Timescales depend on the scope and complexity of the review.

Yes. Reviews are conducted in a fair and proportionate manner. Individuals may be invited to provide information, context, or reflections relevant to the processes or decisions under review.

The outcome is typically a written report setting out findings and recommendations. Reviews often focus on identifying learning points, areas for improvement, and practical steps to strengthen governance, policies, or procedures.

No. Reviews do not usually determine culpability or impose sanctions. If issues emerge that may require further action, the commissioning organisation remains responsible for deciding next steps, which may include commissioning a separate investigation.