World Athletics v Marina Arzamasova

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Marina Arzamasova has been issued by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 27 July 2020 the AIU issued Ms Arzamasova with a Notice of Charge for committing Anti-Doping Rule Violations contrary to Article 2.1 and Article 2.2 of the ADR in connection with the Presence of a Prohibited Substance in the Athletes Sample and the Use of a Prohibited Substance.

The Disciplinary Tribunal consisting of Dr Despina Mavromati (Chair), Janie Soublière and Paul Ciucur determined that an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) had been established pursuant to Article 2.1 of the 2019 IAAF Rules, and as a result a four-year period of Ineligibility is imposed, commencing on 29 July 2019. Ms Arzamasova’s competition results between 29 July 2019 and 22 August 2019 are disqualified.

Sport Resolutions is the independent secretariat to the World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To visit the Athletics Integrity Unit website, please click here.

You may also like

View All

Los Angeles 2028 Olympic organisers generated over $2 billion in commercial revenue so far

The Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games organising committee have generated over $2 billion in domestic sponsorship revenue so far, meaning it may become one of the most commercially successful Olympics in history

Read More

World Athletics v Sheila Chelangat

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against Sheila Chelangat (the Athlete) has been issued by the WA Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal (DAT)

Read More

WNBA proposes $1 million base salary along with compensation tied more closely to the league’s revenue

In the Women’s National Basketball Association’s latest collective bargaining agreement update, it has proposed a $1 million base salary for athletes on max deals, which is the largest contract a player can sign, partly determined by their years of service in the league, and has agreed to increase compensation in line with revenue growth

Read More