Sport Resolutions

International

We provide an independent, trusted forum for the resolution of sports-related disputes, supported by specialist expertise and efficient case administration.

Establishing Jurisdiction

A federation can confer jurisdiction on Sport Resolutions in one of two ways:

  • By including an arbitration clause within its existing statutes or regulations; or
  • On an ad hoc basis, through an arbitration agreement entered into between the relevant parties.

Outsourced Dispute Resolution and Secretariat Support

Sport Resolutions’ international panel is available to federations that wish to outsource their dispute resolution processes in full.

Alternatively, Sport Resolutions can act as an independent secretariat for federations that already operate their own tribunals, providing administrative support while preserving institutional independence.

Rules and Procedure

Sport Resolutions will administer proceedings in accordance with the federation’s own procedural rules.

Where no such rules exist, federations may choose to refer disputes to Sport Resolutions to be administered under the Sport Resolutions Arbitration Rules.

Why Sport Resolutions?

As a not-for-profit organisation, Sport Resolutions offers a service that is:

  • Expert-led and independent
  • Flexible and responsive
  • Timely and efficient
  • Cost-effective for international federations

We provide independent tribunal services to a range of international federations, either by appointing arbitrators from a federation’s own panel or from the Sport Resolutions international panel. Federations we have supported include:

  • World Athletics
  • International Tennis Federation (ITF)
  • International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA)
  • World Rugby

Please scroll down for our FAQ section.

International Services

Do federations need to adopt Sport Resolutions’ Arbitration Rules?

Not necessarily. Sport Resolutions can administer proceedings under a federation’s own rules. Where no procedural rules exist, disputes may be administered under the Sport Resolutions Arbitration Rules.

Can Sport Resolutions provide a full tribunal service?

Yes. Federations may choose to outsource their dispute resolution processes entirely, with access to Sport Resolutions’ panel of experienced arbitrators, legal and specialist experts.

What if a federation already has its own tribunal?

Sport Resolutions can act as an independent secretariat to federations with existing tribunals, providing case administration and procedural support while maintaining the tribunal’s independence.

Who are the individuals on the Sport Resolutions panel?

Our panel comprises highly experienced international arbitrators and practitioners with expertise in sports law, governance, regulatory frameworks, and dispute resolution. Sport Resolutions' panel also includes specialists across different sectors such as doctors, scientists, psychologists, pharmacologists, former police officers, social workers, accountants, HR professionals, magistrates and former athletes, which enables us to tailor appointments to the specific requirements of a case.

Is Sport Resolutions independent from sports governing bodies?

Definitely. Sport Resolutions is an independent, not-for-profit organisation and is not affiliated with any particular sport or governing body.

Why choose Sport Resolutions instead of other arbitration providers?

Sport Resolutions offers specialist sports expertise, procedural flexibility, efficient case management, and a cost-effective service designed specifically for the sport sector. 

  1. Football agents lose appeal against new FIFA regulations
  2. WPBSA v Ten Snooker Players
  3. Golfers v PGA European Tour
  4. World Athletics v Taye Girma Arit
  5. Eight Individuals v World Sailing (Appeal)
  6. ITF v Shoshyna
  7. Poulter, Otaegui and Harding v PGA European Tour
  8. FIFPRO says FIFA deal for foreign players to suspend contracts is too timid
  9. International Tennis Federation v Varvara Lepchenko
  10. FIFA and UEFA suspend all Russian clubs and national teams from competitions
  11. World Athletics v Abeba-Tekulu Gebremeskel
  12. World Athletics v Fernanda Martins
  13. World Athletics v Maria Guadalupe González Romero
  14. World Athletics v Alex Leonardo Quiñonez
  15. World Athletics v Luvo Manyonga
  16. UEFA opens disciplinary proceedings against Barcelona, Real Madrid and Juventus over European Super League
  17. World Athletics v Omar Craddock
  18. World Athletics v James Kibet
  19. ITF v Adeline Bervoux
  20. World Athletics v Marina Arzamasova
  21. World Athletics v Elena Orlova
  22. World Athletics v Elena Ikonnikova
  23. International Tennis Federation (ITF) v Ashley Kratzer
  24. World Athletics v Christian Coleman
  25. World Athletics v Daniel Kinyua Wanjiru
  26. World Athletics v Hassan Chani
  27. World Athletics v El Mahjoub Dazza
  28. World Athletics v Mercy Jerotich Kibarus
  29. World Athletics v Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi
  30. World Athletics v Wilson Kipsang Kiprotich
  31. World Athletics v Gomathi Marimuthu
  32. World Athletics v Vincent Kipsegechi Yator
  33. World Athletics v Ioannis Kyriazis
  34. World Athletics v Michelle-Lee Ahye
  35. IAAF v Sarah Chepchirchir
  36. IAAF v Abderrahmane Kachir
  37. IAAF v Jacob Kibet Chulyo Kendagor
  38. IAAF v Cyrus Rutto
  39. IAAF v Abraham Kiptum
  40. IAAF v Ahmad Al Kamali
  41. IAAF v Yekaterina Medvedeva Ryzhova
  42. Caster Semenya allowed to compete with no medication after Swiss court suspends IAAF ruling
  43. Chelsea lose appeal against FIFA
  44. IAAF upholds ban against Russia into 2019

International Federation Tribunals

Contact Us